Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, 2003 - Mathematics - 362 pages
In a world plagued by disagreement and conflict one might expect that the exact sciences of logic and mathematics would provide a safe harbor. In fact these disciplines are rife with internal divisions between different, often incompatible, systems. Do these disagreements admit of resolution? Can such resolution be achieved without disturbing assumptions that the theorems of logic and mathematics state objective truths about the real world? In this original and historically rich book John Woods explores apparently intractable disagreements in logic and the foundations of mathematics and sets out conflict resolution strategies that evade or disarm these stalemates. An important sub-theme of the book is the extent to which pluralism in logic and the philosophy of mathematics undermines realist assumptions. This book makes an important contribution to such areas of philosophy as logic, philosophy of language and argumentation theory. It will also be of interest to mathematicians and computer scientists.
 

Contents

Conflict in the Abstract Sciences
1
Modalities
40
Managing Inconsistency
80
Semantic Intuitions
120
Sets and Truth
155
Fiction
196
Currying Liars
228
Normativity
277
Notes
327
Bibliography
341
Index
359
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information